1998 DBQ

1998 DBQ The perception that Federalists were loose constructionists and that Jeffersonian Republicans were very strict constructionists was very well founded, but not accurate 100% of the time. The presidency of Thomas Jefferson mainly supported the theory that the Jeffersonian Republicans were strict constructionists. James Madison's presidency supported that theory as well. Both presidents, however, made exceptions to their general policies when an issue was just too big to fit inside the tiny box of their shared school of thought.Jefferson proved himself a constructionist most of the time he was in office. In August of 1800, Jefferson's first year in office, he sent a letter to Gideon Granger (document A) stating his support for the constitution and its basic principles, and also stating that Federalists opposed those principles by their loose interpretation of the document. He implies that loose interpretation leads to change, and in this case, that will create a strong national governme nt that resembles a monarchy and doesn't adhere to the rights of states as guaranteed by the Constitution.Jefferson MonumentIn another letter, this time to Samuel Miller (document B) during his last year holding office, Jefferson reinforces the image of strict constructionism by stating that he intends to break the precedent established by his predecessors to better adhere to the Constitution's policy on separation of church and state. Jefferson's widely known philosophy that the National Bank should not be established because the Constitution didn't say that it could was another example of his strict constructionism (Blum). Blum also mentions that even in his first speech to Congress, Jefferson put the constraint on the ideas he presented them with that everything had to be done "within the limits of their Constitutional powers".Madison, also being a Democratic-Republican, supported the same principles as Jefferson. Speaking for President Madison, Daniel Webster (document...

Natural Selection and Darwin essays

Natural Selection and Darwin essays In Darwins time most scientists believed that each organism and each adaptation was the work of the creator., but theories began to develop by a number of historians stating that evolutionary changes were an effect to changes in nature. There were many reasons for this, such as geological studies were reveling that the earth was much older than stated in biblical creation. Another reason was the similarities between different organisms. When Darwin traveled to the Galapagos Islands he noticed slight variations that made tortoises from different islands distinct. He also observed from island to island the vast number of finches had slight differences. Darwin also noticed that they all seemed to resemble the main finch on the mainland of Equador. This observation had great influence of Darwins thinking and he began to formulate his Theory. Darwins theory of Evolution consists of four main parts. The first one was that organisms have changed over time and the ones living today are different form those of the past also many organisms have become extinct over time. The second part was that all organisms are derived by common ancestors by the branching process. Populations split into different species but they all have one common ancestor. This part of the theory provided an explanation as to why similar species tended to be in the same geographical area. The third part stated that change is gradual and slow, taking place over a long period of time. This explains the fact that no scientist has observed a sudden appearance of a new species. The fourth part of this is that the mechanism of evolutionary change was natural selection. Natural Selection is a process that occurs over successive generations. Darwins had a in depth reasoning for how it works. It starts with the statement that if all the offspring that organisms can produce were to survive and reproduce they would soon overrun the earth. To pre...

ONGC's growth strategy case analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

ONGC's growth strategy case analysis - Essay Example OVL on its part, made offshore investments in Russia, Vietnam and Sudan, apart from acquiring project contracts in other countries. During the years 2002 and 2003, ONGC went in for major financial restructuring, pre-paying all the expensive foreign loans, investing in latest technology and acquiring foreign assets. Corporate plans project a production increase of 16% and a net profit margin of 27% by 2003-04. Plans are afoot to enter into insurance, shipping and power production, but the government does not support these ideas. Thus, ONGC’s key concerns for 2003-‘04 are heavy capital investments, regaining growth in production volumes and discovering new reserves. Its top management, headed by Mr. Subir Raha, CMD, is well recognized for strong and proactive management style. Its management structure is organized region-wise in line with its exploration and production operations, and each regional headquarters has freedom of action and accountability – a trait of the management style of its CMD. Oil and gas exploration was a government monopoly till the sector was opened up for private investment in 1998 by a policy called the New Exploration Licensing Policy (NELP). International companies are now allowed to bid for exploration either alone or in association with local industrial houses, on production sharing basis (with the government). Cairn Energy, Reliance, Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation and Videocon are some of the new players in the market, with the first three named having already succeeded in major gas finds and associated oil reserves. Plans are under implementation for nation-wide gas pipeline grids and they pose a direct challenge to ONGC’s gas business, in times to come. Till 1st April 2002, government controlled the prices of petroleum & product after which the administered price mechanism (APM) was dismantled. ONGC with its strong investment